ROLE DIFFERENTIATION AND JOB PERFORMANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF IN TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS IN RIVERS STATE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study investigated role differentiation and job performance of administrative staff in tertiary institutions in Rivers State. The research design for the study was correlational. A sample size of 250 was drawn from a population of 400 consisting of administrative staff in the offices of (HODs, Deans, Bursar, directors and other principal officer) and principals officers in tertiary institutions in Rivers State. The study used two sets of questionnaires directed at the two sets of respondents. Stratified sampling technique was adopted. The tertiary institutions included the Rivers State University, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt, Capt. Elechi Amadi Polytechnic, Port Harcourt, Ken Saro Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori, and Rivers State College of Health Management Technology. Out of the 250 questionnaire instruments distributed, 235 or 94% were duly completed and returned. The analysis of this study was based on the returned copies. Two research questions and two null hypotheses were posed. The descriptive statistical tool of mean and standard deviation was used in answering the research questions while Pearson Product Correlation Coefficient (PPMC) was used in testing the research hypotheses. The questionnaires were validated by the researcher’s supervisor in the department of Educational Management Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt. The reliability of the instrument was tested using the Crumbach Alpha (SPSS version 23) and obtained .971>.71 which showed that the instrument was highly reliable. The findings showed that principles of unitary command, job rotation, and delegated duty are significantly related to greater performance of admin staff in tertiary institutions in Rivers State. The study recommended among others that administrators should endeavour to allocate roles to staff according to the staff competencies, attitude, skills and job description.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Blau, G., (2005). Toward enhancing research with the social information processing approach to role differentiation. Academy of management review.
Bond, F. W., Flaxaman, P. E. & Bunce, D. (2011). The influence of psychological flexibility on work redesign: Mediated moderation of a work reorganization intervention. Journal of Applied psychology. 29-38 (vol 2).
Brass, D. J. (2009). Structural relationships, job characteristics and worker satisfaction and performance, administrative science quarterly Journal of the Service,26, 331-348.
Breaugh, A. (2005). The measurement of work autonomy. Human relationship, 38, 551-570.
H. Singh, J. Motmwani, Kumar A., A review and analysis of the state of the art research on productivity, Industrial management and data systems, Vol. 100, 2344-41, 2000.
Kinnandar, A. & Grondahl P., “Productivity development in educational systems, a project proposal within prosper, internal report, Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology, 2009.
Koss, E. & Lewis, D. (2012). Productivity or efficiency, measuring what we really want, National productivity review, Vol 12, pp273 -95.
Faturochman T. R. (2007). The job characteristics theory. Colus Publishers.
Fried, Y. and Ferris, G. R. (2009). The validity of the job characteristics model. A review and meta-analysis. Personnel psychology, Vol. 3 pp287-322.
Bryan, A. and Crammer, D. (2012). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows. A guide for social sciences.
Barridam, D. M. (2011). Research methods in administrative sciences, third edition. Sherbooke Associates.