On the Adequacy Model for the Relationship Between Commodity Terms of Trade and Money Supply in Nigeria
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research determined an adequate model for the relationship between commodity terms of trade and money supply in Nigeria. The Kwaitkowski Phillips-Schmidt-Shin (KPSS) unit root test was used to establish whether the commodity terms of trade variables for the three sets of data were stationary. Three models were built based on commodity terms of trade’ stationarity. The first Model is the actual series before transformation. The second Model is the log model and the third model is the square root model. All models contained the variables, Live Animals, Vegetable Products, Prepared Foodstuffs & Beverages, Mineral Products, Chemical & Allied Industries Products, Plastic and Rubber and Cement Products, Leather Products, Wood Products, Paper Making Material Products, Textiles Products, Footwears & Headgears, Ceramics products, Precious Metals Products, Machinery and Chemical Appliances, Vehicles & Parts Products, Base Metals and Miscellaneous Manufactured Articles. The ordinary least square method was used to estimate the parameters and the actual model has six (6) significant parameters, R2 = 99.1%, AIC = 347.66, BIC = 350.96 and DW = 1.60, the square root model has twelve (12) significant parameters, R2 = 99.6%, AIC = 116.40, BIC = 119.90 and DW = 2.496, and the log model has one (1) significant parameter, R2 = 99.9%, AIC = 25.57, BIC = 28.87 and DW = 2.07. The result showed that the square root model which has the highest significant parameters, (x1 - Live Animals, x2 - Vegetable Products, x3 - Prepared Foodstuffs & Beverages, x5 - Chemical & Allied Industries Products, x6 - Plastic and Rubber and Cement Products, x7 - Leather Products, x8 - Wood Products, x10 - Textiles Products, x13 - Precious Metals Products, x16 - Vehicles & Parts Products, and x17 - Miscellaneous Manufactured Articles), is the adequate model for identifying the relationship between money supply (MS) and commodity terms of trade (CTOT) since its independent variables have more significant parameters at 1%, 5% and 10% levels. This result contradicts the more works carried out using only logarithm transformations when the variables are large values. It was recommended that more detailed work be carried out using other transformation techniques (i.e another power transformation techniques) to identify a more suitable model to be used for the study or prediction of the variables.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Akaike Information Criteria (1974). A new at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transformation on Automatic control 19(0); 716-723. Doi:10.119/TAC.1974.1100705 http;//dx.doi.org/10.119%2fTAC.1974.1100705)MR0423716 (http;/www.ams.org/mathscinetgetitem.mr=0423716).
Akpanta, A. & Iwueze. I. (2009). On applying the bartlett transformation methods to time series data. Journal of Mathematical sciences 20(3), 227-243.
Bertrand, G. & Suhaib, K. (2019). Commodity terms of trade: A new database. International Monetary Fund Working Paper.
https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484393857.001
Biu,O., Arimie, O., Ebe, O.(2021). Commodity terms of trade and their effects on money supply in Nigeria. International Journal of Reseacrch and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), 2(6), 158-168.
Bland, J., Altman, D. (1996). The use of transformation when comparing two means. British Medical Journal, 312(96), 1153-1163.
Central Bank of Nigeria(2018a). Monetary Policy. https://www.cbn.gov.ng
Collier, P. & Goderis, B. (2012). Commodity prices and growth: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review, 56(6), 1241-1260.
Dehn, J. (2000) Private investment in developing countries: The Effects of commodity shocks and uncertainty. WPS, Oxford, 11
Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1979). “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Journal of the American statistical association, 74(366a), 427- 431.
Dickey, D. A., Bell, W. R. and Miller, R. B. (1986). Unit Roots in Time Series Models; Test and Implication, American Statistician, 40: 12-26.
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P., Schmidt, P. & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root, Journal of Econometrics 54(92), 159–178.
Ndiyo, N. (2005). Fundamentals of research in bahaviourial science and humanities. Wusen Publishers.
Otuonye, E., Iwueze, I. & Ohakwe J. (2011). The effect of square root transformation on the error component of the multiplicative time series model. International Journal of Statistics and Systems. 6(4), 461-476.
Phillips, P.C.B. (1987). “Time Series Regression with a Unit Root,” Econometrica, 55, 227-301.
Phillips, P.C.B. and Perron, P. (1988). “Testing for Unit Roots in Time Series Regression,” Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
Phillips, P.C.B. and Xiao, Z. (1998). “A Primer on Unit Root Testing,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 423-470.
Spatafora, N. & Tytell, I. (2009). Commodity terms of trade: The history of booms and busts. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 09-205